WordPress database error: [Duplicate column name 'field_order']
ALTER TABLE `so_cf7dbplugin_submits` ADD COLUMN `field_order` INTEGER

WordPress database error: [Duplicate column name 'file']
ALTER TABLE `so_cf7dbplugin_submits` ADD COLUMN `file` LONGBLOB

WordPress database error: [Duplicate key name 'submit_time_idx']
ALTER TABLE `so_cf7dbplugin_submits` ADD INDEX `submit_time_idx` ( `submit_time` )

WordPress database error: [Duplicate key name 'form_name_idx']
ALTER TABLE `so_cf7dbplugin_submits` ADD INDEX `form_name_idx` ( `form_name` )

Utu Csra Agreement » Sophie T

Blog

Apr
14

Utu Csra Agreement
by admin | No Comments

The airlines are trying to replace one of the crew members in the train cabin with technology and set up a one-person operation. The crew coherence agreements, negotiated for many years by SMART-TD and its predecessors, stand in the way, but are undermined by these and other measures. This website provides links to a variety of important documents, agreements and conditions of protection, as well as a link to a database of thousands of arbitration awards representing the various trades of SMART`s transport division. In total, THE CBC unions represent more than 105,000 railway workers covered by the national agreements of the various organizations and represent more than 80% of the workforce that will be affected by this round of negotiations. Such notices are required by Section 6 of the Railway Works Act to reopen the agreements. With this communication to the NCCC and the ncCC`s previous communication, the parties will begin the next round of negotiations. The Railway Works Act protects agreements from any amendments, except under the procedures set out in Section 6 of the Act. The airlines agreed on the crew members years ago. Not only that, but to end the ongoing struggle for the crew, the airlines also agreed to moratorium regulations that excluded each section 6 of a crew communication until the last protected employee voluntarily left the service. This event has not yet occurred. These are the facts, but they are not found anywhere in a recount in the wearers` favorite publications. Rather, it is the old song of the anti-unionist.

The apologist who says they trust the porters, they just want the best for you. right. Do airlines want to protect you for life? At what cost? And if they decide they don`t like this agreement anymore, they`re going to ignore it, like they tried to ignore our moratorium rules and put you on the road? These apologists say they have internal shovels, but I have never seen a “commentator” at the negotiating table. They`re marginals. On November 20, the presidents of the SMART Transportation Division (SMART-TD) worked on railways represented by the National Carrier Conference Committee (NCCC), the changes proposed by smart-TD to agreements on wages, normal conditions and working conditions. In accordance with the provision of the moratorium in the last national agreement, today was the first day that the airlines had the opportunity to open the next round of national negotiations and negotiate a new agreement, and they served us accordingly this morning. The case was filed on October 3, 2019 by BNSF, CSX, Kansas City Southern, Grand Trunk Western, Norfolk Southern, Illinois Central, Union Pacific and Belt Railway Company of Chicago, arguing that moratoriums in the various crew-consisting agreements do not exclude airlines from the reopening of the crew. The articles also try to scare you by saying that airlines will unilaterally reduce crews at the end of the last moratorium. That is not how the law works. The moratoriums did not succeed for the sunset crew. On the contrary, Moratoria prohibits one of the parties from sending a notice in accordance with Section 6 in order to amend or modify the current Crew Agreements Consist until the last protected personnel member is eliminated.



Comments are closed.

Telefon: 20 64 60 33 • mail@sophiet.dkFacebook • CVR: 31 22 33 42